May It Please The Court

MIPTC Home
MIPTC
Features
RSS Feeds
Blogrolls
Profiles
 
MIPTC Author
About J. Craig Williams
Primer
Contributors
 

Bookstore:
May It Please The Court
by Leonard Rivkin
Barnes & Noble

 
Law.com CLE
Law.com Books
 
 

Weblog Comments
Return to the Weblog

Quote of the Day - Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using his intelligence he is just using his memory. - Leonardo da Vinci
Claim Your Profile on Avvo

New Category In The Law: Why Appeal?

In the category of "Why did this case get appealed?", we get the State of California whining about taking its lumps after an unfavorable verdict.  Let me set the stage:  when the State designs roads that are unsafe, it typically gets held liable for the resulting injuries to the motorist. 

The State lost in this case, and the appellate court upheld the trial court's decision.  What is most troubling about the State's appeal, however, is that it cited no authority for one of the issues it took up on appeal:  the application of joint and several liability (each party is liable in full if the other party is unable to or does not pay).  The other troubling aspect of the tersely worded six-page opinion is the court's very quick and unrepentant application of the collateral source rule (a potentially liable party is not entitled to offset its liability with payments made to the victim by another party unrelated to the lawsuit, like an insurance company, or in this case, an employer). 

Has CalTrans learned its lesson yet?

Posted by J. Craig Williams on Sunday, April 16, 2006 at 23:25 Comments (0)


Comments

No comments added yet. Be the first to comment on this entry!
Add your Comments
You may also leave audio comments by calling our audio comment line at 206-338-3088. Leave us a message and we'll post it here.

Please do not include any HTML or URLs in the comment field. If included, your comment will not be accepted.
*Indicates required fields
Name*:
Country*:
E-mail:
Comments*:
Character Count: