May It Please The Court

RSS Feeds
MIPTC Author
About J. Craig Williams

May It Please The Court
by Leonard Rivkin
Barnes & Noble CLE Books
Latest Blogs
12/4/2008 - How to Get Sued

1/5/2005 - Your City Leaders Aren't Listening To You

12/29/2004 - Niagara Falls? Slowly I Turned, Step by Step, Inch by Inch.

12/25/2004 - Season's Greetings

This Month's Posts
Links of Interest [more]
Quote of the Day - Adam was the author of sin, and I wish he had taken out an international copyright on it. - Mark Twain
Claim Your Profile on Avvo
There are 2034 Journal Items on 255 page(s) and you are on page number 84

Lawyer 2 Lawyer Internet Radio Visits Israel and the Netherlands

With the invasion of Iraq and the adoption of a new constitution in Iraq, we have stepped into the arena of International Constitutional Law.  In a post 9/11 world, we have also been introduced to the importance of Counter-terrorism.  Today on Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we explore International Constitutional Law, the countries involved, the many aspects, what the future holds for international countries and the importance of legal education.

We will also take a look inside the world of counter-terrorism and the efforts taken by many to educate and secure the world.  Please join me and my fellow blogger and co-host Bob Ambrogi as we get insight on these topics from two very interesting guests, Professor Amos N. Guiora, who is a professor of law at Case Western Reserve University School of Law and director of the Institute for Global Security Law and Policy and Dean Tom Zwart International Dean and LLM-Director at the Utrecht School of Law in the Netherlands.  Don't miss this show.


Printer friendly page Posted by J. Craig Williams on Thursday, March 15, 2007 at 10:14 Comments (0) |

Lexis Upgrades Time Matters, Stumbles, Falls Flat On Its Technology Face

I'm Blogging This

Using new software can be a hit-or-miss prospect largely because the developers rely on you and me to help get the bugs out of it.  But when you're on Version 8, you should have most, if not all, of the bugs exterminated.

Should have, that is.

Hopes were high when Lexis bought Time Matters three years ago.  As time has passed, however, they've faded.  One of my law school professors once famously remarked, "Hope springs eternal."  Apparently, that sentiment doesn't apply to software upgrades.

WLF just upgraded from Time Matters Version 7 to Version 8 this weekend, and today, despite our hopes, we still have the same problems we had Friday.  Perhaps one of the most annoying problems is the billing interface.  Every time we open a completed slip, the dollar amount drops to zero.

That's a bit of a problem for a law firm that sends invoices to its clients each month.  Even though our clients don't complain, it really has a disastrous effect on cash flow.  But that's not the only problem.  Despite Lexis's claims that the upgrade fixes the software's bugs, even the best of intentions go wrong - things that worked in prior versions don't work in this new version.  Ouch.  Please, don't get me started - there are a host of other problems, as well - but too long a list for this post.

We've made the billing interface suggestion to Lexis numerous times, asking them to fix the bug, but with no results.  Apparently, Lexis's Quality Control Department isn't talking to its Tech Support Department, and vice versa.  So, we're likely going to switch programs, encourage others who are thinking of buying the Time Matters program not to, and generally start a boycott.

Can you hear me now, Lexis?  I'm voting with my feet, and my blawg.

Printer friendly page Posted by J. Craig Williams on Monday, March 12, 2007 at 23:55 Comments (6) |

Surely You're Shocked That 90% Of All Email Is Spam

You and the Securities and Exchange Commission, that is.  The SEC is shocked that spammers promote stock through email - so shocked that it suspended trading in 35 stocks that were promoted by spam.  So shocked that the stocks were suspended for a whopping 10 days.

That'll teach those spammers.

Stock spam amounts to 30% of the spam that's out there - nearly 100 million stock spam emails a week.  The other 70% must be spam ads for Viagra, if my inbox is any indication. 

Former California Congressman (now SEC Chair) Chris Cox, had this to say in a press release, "When spam clogs our mailboxes, it's annoying.  When it rips off investors, it's illegal and destructive.  Today's trading suspensions, and actions that will follow, should send a clear message to spammers:  the S.E.C. will hold you accountable."

Well, maybe not the spammers, but the companies, who the SEC believes are complicit in the spam campaigns.  The way the scam works (you knew it was a scam, right?) is that a spammer picks a stock with a limited number of publicly available shares, then buys most of the shares.  Next comes the spam email "tipping" you and me off to a great buy.  We rush in, our demand drives up the value of the remaining stock, and the spammer then dumps his/her shares at these peak values, driving the price through the floor just hours after fools rushed in to buy.

The stock then never regains its glory high. 

Punishing the company by suspending it however, may be like killing the messenger without solid proof of the company's complicity.  Punishing the stock purchaser before the run-up would perhaps be a more effective tactic. 

But I'm just a country lawyer in backwater Newport Beach.  And I don't by stock based on email tips.

Printer friendly page Posted by J. Craig Williams on Friday, March 09, 2007 at 00:55 Comments (0) |

San Francisco Seeks To Limit Use Of Plastic Grocery Bags

It's one thing to be on the Left Coast, a.k.a. the land of fruits, nuts, twigs and berries.  It's quite another, however, to be North of the Left Coast.

Quite another thing altogether.

The City and County of San Francisco City/County Supervisors are trying to push through a measure to limit the sale of plastic grocery bags.  Pause for a minute here and contemplate that word:  "limit." 

But before we get started with that analysis, let's look at the consequences of such a "limitation."  It likely means more consumers will be using paper bags.  While that option is friendlier on the recycling end of things, it does mean, on the other hand, that we'll be cutting more trees down.  

The supposed environmentally conscious supervisors explain that result with two options:  recyclable plastic paper bags or canvas bags.  Sure, San Franciscans could all become canvas bag-toting shoppers, but the only way that's going to happen is to completely ban paper and plastic.  And if you offer two types of plastic bags, then the recycling team is going to have a helluva time distinguishing the two, and they'll end up with both in the regular trash instead of being recycled. 

What's most troubling, however, is that word I identified earlier:  "limit."  Notice I didn't say "eliminate" or "ban."  The City/County plans to enact this legislative marvel only against grocery stores with more than $2 million in sales.  In other words, there's a gaping hole of an exception that won't end up keeping plastic bags out of the trash.  The small stores will still be able to use plastic bags.

If you're going to put your toe in the water, why not jump in all the way?  Just get it over with and ban plastic altogether. 

Just don't ask for a plastic milk jug.  If San Francisco has its way, you'll be getting your milk in a paper milk jug.

Printer friendly page Posted by J. Craig Williams on Thursday, March 08, 2007 at 23:39 Comments (1) |

Lawyer to Lawyer Internet Radio Gets A Sidebar With The Bench

In the world of law, judges and attorneys have been working side by side throughout history.   We each couldn't do our job without the other, in fact.

On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, we will turn to three expert judges to discover what they look for in an attorney and what they expect.  Please join me and my fellow blogger and co-host Bob Ambrogi as we welcome Justice William W. Bedsworth, an Associate Justice for the California Fourth District Court of Appeal, the Honorable William Dressel, President of the National Judicial College in Nevada and Judge Steve Leben, President of the American Judges Association, to discuss their view from behind the bench.


Printer friendly page Posted by J. Craig Williams on Wednesday, March 07, 2007 at 20:03 Comments (0) |

Indian Tribe Files Suit Over 13-year Delay In Acting On Gaming Application With 60-day Required Response

The fine folks over at Courthouse News bring us this tidbit from their files:  A Complaint filed by the Seminole Indians against the Secretary of the Interior. 

By law the Secretary of the Interior has 60 days to act on an Indian tribe's application for a gaming license.  The Seminole Tribe of Florida claims several secretaries of the Interior have failed to act on their application for over 13 years.

That's a lot longer than 60 days, even if your office doesn't come furnished with a calendar.  Apparently, the Secretary of Interior lacked the funding to purchase not only the paper to write back to the Tribe, but also the means to track the days and years that were ticking by.

That's the government for you. 

While MIPTC understands Indian law, doesn't it make sense that if you are a sovereign nation, you don't need to ask permission?  But that's just me.

Printer friendly page Posted by J. Craig Williams on Tuesday, March 06, 2007 at 00:21 Comments (0) |

Do Not Mail Bills Create Conflict Between States and Federal Government

About eleven states have introduced "Do not mail" bills, modeled after the Federal Trade Commission's "Do not call" telephone registry.  The states include Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, New York, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Texas, Vermont (just last week) and Washington.  Don't worry if your state is not among them, though.  The laws, if enacted, will not likely survive a constitutional attack.

You may remember from your Civics class that the Postal Service is regulated solely by the federal government, and that the several states have no authority to get in the middle.  In legal jargon, we call it preemption.

Nevertheless, many legislators around the company are jumping on the bandwagon.  They argue that homeowners should be able to control what arrives in their mailbox.  True or not, MIPTC wishes those legislators would turn their attention to what arrives in my e-mail inbox, not my mailbox. 

That sentiment aside, the "Do not mail" bills being proposed exempt two important categories:  politicians and non-profit organizations.  Surprise, surprise.

From about August to November 2 each year, my mailbox is overcome by mailers from politicians and I can't find my regular mail in between the political advertisements.  I also don't need any more "free" return address labels from non-profit groups.  At the rate I send letters, it will be 2075 before I start writing my return address by hand again.

On the other side of the issue, direct mail marketers argue the legislation would hurt businesses that advertise by mail and will financially hurt the Postal Service because it relies heavily on mail advertising as a main revenue source.  Can you imagine where the cost of a first class stamp will go next?

If you want to get off direct mailing lists whether your state enacts these laws or not, then register here

Now if the politicians and the non-profit groups would honor that registration, we'd be all set.

Printer friendly page Posted by J. Craig Williams on Monday, March 05, 2007 at 21:32 Comments (3) |

Punitive Damages Award Reduced To Amount NTE Compensatory Damages

Don't get too excited here; California is not yet stepping back from recent US Supreme Court opinions (Gore v. BMW, etc.) that limit punitive damages to something less than 10 times compensatory damages. 

The court of appeal, however, is limiting punitive damages in situations where only economic damages are awarded.  In other words, if you didn't suffer personal injuries, your punitive damages award may not exceed the compensatory damages.

In the case that led up to this decision, a company called Mach I acted as a broker for Jet Source.  Mach I located, inspected and purchased jet aircraft for Jet Source.  Later rather than sooner, Jet Source discovered that Mach I was inflating the purchase price of the planes and keeping an extra profit for itself.  Jet Source sued, and recovered $6.5 million on this issue, and the jury hammered Mach I with some $26 million in punitive damages.

The appellate court believed that Jet Source was a sophisticated buyer (not a vulnerable victim), and while Mach I's conduct "merits no praise," its conduct was not so reprehensible that justified a punitive damages verdict that was four times the compensatory award.   In a partially-published opinion, the court held that such an award violated due process, and must be reduced to no more than the compensatory award.

Printer friendly page Posted by J. Craig Williams on Sunday, March 04, 2007 at 16:32 Comments (2) |

Page:  << Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84 85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153  154  155  156  157  158  159  160  161  162  163  164  165  166  167  168  169  170  171  172  173  174  175  176  177  178  179  180  181  182  183  184  185  186  187  188  189  190  191  192  193  194  195  196  197  198  199  200  201  202  203  204  205  206  207  208  209  210  211  212  213  214  215  216  217  218  219  220  221  222  223  224  225  226  227  228  229  230  231  232  233  234  235  236  237  238  239  240  241  242  243  244  245  246  247  248  249  250  251  252  253  254  255  Next >>