May It Please The Court

RSS Feeds
MIPTC Author
About J. Craig Williams

May It Please The Court
by Leonard Rivkin
Barnes & Noble CLE Books
Latest Blogs
12/4/2008 - How to Get Sued

1/5/2005 - Your City Leaders Aren't Listening To You

12/29/2004 - Niagara Falls? Slowly I Turned, Step by Step, Inch by Inch.

12/25/2004 - Season's Greetings

This Month's Posts
Links of Interest [more]
Quote of the Day - This place makes Mayberry look like a think tank. - Dennis Miller
Claim Your Profile on Avvo
There are 2034 Journal Items on 255 page(s) and you are on page number 168

11th Circuit Court Upholds Georgia's Invalidation Of Noncompete Agreements

Noncompete agreements have taken an entirely new twist, and it's no April Fool's joke. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Marsh McLennan Companies can't enforce its noncompete agreement with one of its executives.

Unfortunately for Marsh, the dispute ended up in a Georgia court, where the law on noncompete agreements is pretty tough. So tough, in fact, that if any one provision is invalid, then the entire agreement is deemed invalid.

No such thing as a savings clause to protect the remainder of the agreement. If you're a national or international company with offices in more than one state, then you may want to think about where you litigate these cases. In California, noncompete agreements are generally unenforceable. Trade secret agreements, on the other hand, are.

Depending on what type of agreement you've structured with your employees, you want to give some thought to what court you appear trying to enforce it. Marsh, in this instance, apparently found itself in the wrong forum, and now its noncompete agreements are invalid - across the country. There's a lot of that going around lately.


Printer friendly page Posted by J. Craig Williams on Wednesday, April 06, 2005 at 00:52 Comments (0) |

Round Up The Posse

I thought the Wild Wild West was a thing of the past, but after reading the following article, I realize now I may have been mistaken. Apparently, if you are dissatisfied with the job the Department of Homeland Security is doing patrolling our nationís borders for illegal immigrants, the Minuteman Project seeks your assistance in helping guard the United Statesí Southwestern border.

The group claims that their effort is essentially just an expanded version of a Neighborhood Watch group, but I canít imagine McGruff the Crime Dogģ approving. This tactic is a far cry from your neighbors keeping an eye out the window during dinner or watching your house and bringing in your newspaper while youíre on vacation.

As grateful as I am that my neighbors look out for my family in those ways, I wouldnít feel comfortable if one of them spent 24 hours a day sitting on their front porch with binoculars and a police scanner either, but thatís just me.


Printer friendly page Posted by Michel J. Ayer on Tuesday, April 05, 2005 at 13:15 Comments (0) |

Mix Together Houses, Freeways, Open Space, Regulations, Lawsuits, And What Do You Get?

The process to get through CEQA is not an easy one. Even the Guidelines can be daunting. Depending on who you're talking to, the California Environmental Quality Act is either a benefactor or the devil.

Governor Schwarzenegger wants to streamline CEQA and honor his campaign pledge to have us spend more time at home instead of on the freeways.

The governor and the legislature are considering changes to CEQA designed to provide affordable housing. Environmentalists claim more housing means more cars, which translates directly into clogged freeways. Environmentalists want less pollution, less cars and more open space.

Builders want less regulations and less lawsuits challenging environmental issues. Increased time dealing with regulations and court challenges drive up housing costs.

There are a significant number of bills pending on housing, and more than 24 on CEQA alone. Homeowners, on the other hand, are seeing record prices for homes, and the median house price has hit well over $400,000 in many counties. Some homeowners think that more houses will drive down the value of their home, since supply is short now.

The legislature has apparently focused the debate on infill, not necessarily urban sprawl that attracts the most resistance from environmentalists.

There seems to be no easy answer to the combination of high housing prices, clogged freeways, preservation of endangered species and open space, the need for affordable housing and less government regulation and (can you believe a lawyer's saying this?) less lawsuits.

So, here's your chance to weigh in. If you live in California, or even if you don't, how would you solve this confluence of issues?


Printer friendly page Posted by J. Craig Williams on Monday, April 04, 2005 at 15:56 Comments (0) |

Put Your Pen Where Your Mouth Is: Sign On the Dotted Line

Yep, I'm lecturing. Again.

On a rant.

You've undoubtedly discussed the Terry Schiavo matter. I've asked you to put your pen where your mouth is, and get a living will.

Hopefully, you've followed through or are in the process.

But, do you have a financial power of attorney? Sure, your friends and family know whether you want them to pull the plug. That's not your entire life, however. There's the money part, too.

A financial power of attorney allows them to put their finger in the dike if you are incapacitated.

Please, please plan ahead. Everyone will be the better for it.


Printer friendly page Posted by J. Craig Williams on Sunday, April 03, 2005 at 14:59 Comments (0) |

What's The Difference Between An Airboat And A Snowplane?

Here's one for you: What has a propeller, no wings, skis, is called a plane but never leaves the ground?

Think I'm kidding? Nope. Check out the snowplane, the snowplane and the snowplane. Each a little bit different, but the same thing.

There were some 125 people that held permits to use (no, not fly) them in the Grand Teton National Park. Now, however, they've been (pardon the pun) grounded.

The National Park Service revoked the snowplane permits, but allowed some 50 snowmobiles into GTNP. The NPS said the snowplanes were too loud, and interfered with the values of silence in the Park. I've never heard a snowplane, but I have heard a snowmobile. I've even ridden one. They're like motorcycles on skis. Loud.

I don't know, maybe they thought it was supposed to be like a library. In my law school, we had a sign on the door of our library that said, "If your books have pictures in them, please don't act like it." The NPS apparently doesn't want people to enjoy the Park with machines that make noise.

Wonder what they do in the Everglades with airboats?


Printer friendly page Posted by J. Craig Williams on Saturday, April 02, 2005 at 23:02 Comments (0) |

Don't Worry, The Insurance Company's Check Is In The Mail - 11 Years Later

You bought an earthquake insurance policy, and then your house collapsed during the earthquake. You submit your claim, and wait for the insurance company's check. It's 1994.

You wait. You wait some more. No check arrives.

You go talk to an attorney, and find out you're not the only one. There are lots of you who haven't been paid. So many, in fact, that the California legislature passes legislation, allowing you to sue your insurance company for bad faith and collect punitive damages. That's because you had to wait so long for the check that the statute of limitations passed you by.

The year? We're in the new millennium - it's 2000.

Guess what happens next?

That's right. The insurance company says the statute is unconstitutional. They claim it's an ex post facto law.

This scenario seems so unreal that you may think I am making this up. I assure you, it happened. Right down the street from where you live.

The Court finally decided that you are entitled to collect punitive damages from the insurance company. Now, however, it's 2005. Eleven years after you submitted your claim.

How long do you think it will take 21st Century Insurance Group, the insurance company that denied the original claim, to write a check?


Printer friendly page Posted by J. Craig Williams on Friday, April 01, 2005 at 18:35 Comments (0) |

Lessons From Terri Schiavo? Get A Living Will.

Frequent readers know that MIPTC does not address sensational or entertainment news, and I have steadfastly avoided the Terri Schiavo story.1 MIPTC would like to express its sympathies to both the Schiavos and the Schindlers over their loss.

If there is one thing that we all take away from this tragedy - please, please - sign a living will that expresses your wishes.

Craig's Notes

1 Spain's Freelance Corner asked me for an American lawyer's thoughts on the case. I obliged, and FC's author, Emilio Alonso, posted them here, with comments. Part is in English, and you can translate the Comments on site.


Printer friendly page Posted by J. Craig Williams on Thursday, March 31, 2005 at 10:40 Comments (1) |

Both Sides Turn To The Courts To Litigate Environmental Laws

The epic battle over property set-asides for endangered species is about to come to a head. Late last year, the Bush administration changed regulations to allow development to move forward if there were late discoveries of endangered species on the property.

Environmental groups fought back, and the dispute has now spilled over into the courts. Not once, but twice.

The suits argue that the critical habitat designations do little to save species, but drive housing costs though the roof.

The first suit seeks to force the USFWS to change critical habitat designations for 27 plant and animal species and the second suit seeks to force the agency to change habitat areas for 15 vernal pool species. PLF filed the two lawsuits on behalf of associations representing California family farmers and ranchers, home builders, and business owners throughout the state.

The environmental battle is being fought on other fronts, too.

The Center for Biological Diversity filed a third suit yesterday challenging the Bush Administration's new regulations governing logging, mining, and grazing. This suit argues that the regulation prevents forest planning decisions from being subjected to judicial review by granting unlimited discretion to local forest rangers. The suit would affect 192 million acres of National Forests in 42 states, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.


Printer friendly page Posted by J. Craig Williams on Thursday, March 31, 2005 at 10:14 Comments (0) |

Page:  << Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153  154  155  156  157  158  159  160  161  162  163  164  165  166  167  168 169  170  171  172  173  174  175  176  177  178  179  180  181  182  183  184  185  186  187  188  189  190  191  192  193  194  195  196  197  198  199  200  201  202  203  204  205  206  207  208  209  210  211  212  213  214  215  216  217  218  219  220  221  222  223  224  225  226  227  228  229  230  231  232  233  234  235  236  237  238  239  240  241  242  243  244  245  246  247  248  249  250  251  252  253  254  255  Next >>