May It Please The Court: Weblog of legal news and observations, including a quote of the day and daily updates

Skip To Content

MIPTC Author:


The Sled:

Listed in Latino Who's Who, June 2014
Locations of visitors to this page

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Weblog Comments

Return to the Weblog

Quote of the Day - The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it always to be kept alive. - Thomas Jefferson

Testing The Boundaries of The Fifth Amendment's Public Use Requirement

What is eminent domain? It's the right of the government to condemn your property without your consent for public use upon payment of just compensation. How's that for a mouthful?

Today's dispute centers on the definition of public interest.

New London, Connecticut, is the hotbed for this question. The City wants to condemn homes for a development to build a conference center, hotel complex, offices, condominiums, and eventually, an aquarium. The complex would be built by private developers.

The homeowners charge that it's essentially corporate welfare. The government, on the other hand, claims the condemnation falls within their power. Whatever the Supreme Court's decision is, it will have far-reaching effects.

It's the last phrase of the Fifth Amendment that we're fighting over.

How far does the government's power reach? Usually redevelopment is fairly easy, within some boundaries. Property is blighted, contaminated, run-down or some other problem exists. The citizens want the place cleaned up and returned to productive use.

What about the case here, where the homes in the Fort Trumbull area are fine? No one is complaining. The lawns are kept up, cars parked in the garage. Right there next to the Eagle, the ship I sailed on in the 1976 Tall Ships Race. It's Main Street America.

New London will make more tax revenue from the development. It will also provide more shopping and potentially a public aquarium.

Who's right? How would you want the Supreme Court to rule?

Posted by J. Craig Williams on 2/24/2005 at 11:19 Comments (1)



Comments by Debbie Hart from United States on Saturday, February 26, 2005 at 16:41

May it please the Supreme Court to rule in favor of the homeowners. The alternative is unthinkable and would be intolerable.
Thank you.


Comments are now closed.

Send your comments directly to the author at jcraigwms at (remove spaces and add @ symbol in place of the "at").