May It Please The Court: Weblog of legal news and observations, including a quote of the day and daily updates

Skip To Content

MIPTC Author:

Bookstore:



Listed in Latino Who's Who, June 2014
 Attorney
Categories [more]
General (1976)
Lawyer 2 Lawyer (285)
Latest Blogs
This Month's Posts [more]
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Links of Interest [more]
Locations of visitors to this page



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.



law-blogs.net


Quote of the Day - The artist doesn't have time to listen to the critics. The ones who want to be writers read the reviews, the ones who want to write don't have the time to read reviews. - William Faulkner
Adjust font size: A A+ A++
Claim Your Profile on Avvo
An Affiliate of the Law.com Network

From the Law.com Newswire

Sign up to receive Legal Blog Watch by email
View a Sample

Blawg Review #28

Trial By Fire

Here's May It Please The Court's Blawg Review #28.  Since this post is written by a defense trial lawyer, this Blawg Review takes the form of a trial, from just before opening statement through appeal and a possible settlement.  If you've watched Perry Mason or any number of other lawyer shows, then you know most of what your about to read; if you're a lawyer, you've seen this sequence before.  Rest assured, though, no one's actually on trial here.  The idea behind the theme was to lend a familiar structure, and see what round pegs could be pounded into square holes, since the blawgosphere doesn't follow the same convention. 

At most, the lawyers who write these blawgs are on trial, to be judged by you, gentle reader.  In MIPTC's opinion, it will be the first time a trial results in all winners and no losers. 

Motions in Limine

Before we get started, there are a few Motions in Limine that the MIPTC Old English Judge (drawn by the author of Conservative Crust and modeled after Justice Bullingham on Rumpole of the Bailey) has ordered be observed, which will give you a bit more information about this site if you're willing to play along.  Think about whether you want to follow the Judge’s orders.  After all, do you really want to pick a fight with the judge?  MITPC recently underwent a design change, and it added a few new features, including some that involve flash animation and sound, with kudos to the design team featured at the very bottom of this blawg page.  If you're a first-time visitor and had your speakers turned up, you may have seen and heard the quill in the masthead scratch out "May It Please The Court," the name of this blawg.  If you didn't, then hover your cursor over the inkwell until it turns into a hand, and with your speakers on, then click the inkwell once. 

For comparison's sake, if you want to see MIPTC's old design before this new look, then visit the Way Back Machine.  Thanks to Leonard Rivkin, Esq., MITPC now holds the .com address that he used.  That's why his photo and book, May It Please The Court, are over there on the left navigation bar.  MIPTC also offers translations of its pages, and it's ADA-compliant, offering you the option of a full-text page.

You may likewise notice (if you're paying close attention) the masthead's wax seal sparkle.  It occasionally happens, but there's nothing that triggers it.  There are a couple of other gems, one of which we will introduce now to get your attention.  Actually, you want to get the Old English Judge's attention, so run your cursor up to the Old English Judge in the masthead (I'm assuming here your speakers are still on), and click just once.  Be patient, more will come later.  Yes, the "ahem" is mine.  The permalink to this post is the folded-over piece of paper icon to the right of the printer icon, both located immediately below this post.  The printer icon will give you a clean copy of this post, sans ads.  As with every trial, the Judge warns everyone to watch the ethical issuesBen Cowgill highlights an upcoming October 19 ABA Connection teleconference that he's hosting on the ethics of law firm marketing.

Voir Dire

In order to conduct the trial, we've got to pick a jury, so we'll have to voir dire the jury to see if we can empanel a jury of your peers.  Looks like we've got one member already - you, gentle reader, so please have a seat in Juror Chair number one, and we'll start the questioning of the other juror candidates.  First, we have Blawg Review Contributing Editors - four of them - to welcome.  There's Kevin HellerMichael Cernovich, Evan Schaeffer, and one anonymous juror, the Editor 'n' Chef (no, I don't think that last link is "Ed." - as sometimes signed - it's just an interesting blog that has the same moniker).  Although MIPTC discovered the Editor's name in the juror questionnaire, due to privacy reasons, I have to demur from revealing it.  That gives us five, and we're going to sit a six-pack jury here since we're in federal court, so we need one more juror.  Since I'm writing this Blawg Review #28, I guess that means me, Craig Williams, will have to sit as juror number six.  Another generally unknown MIPTC feature can be seen with a click of your mouse on my photo in the left navigation bar.

OK, we're got our jury selected, so we can call the docket.  Here's another MIPTC Motion in Limine.  Please once again run your cursor up to the Old English Judge and click just once (again, speakers on, please).  Great!  The bailiff has called the docket of Blawg Review #28, and we're ready for the trial to start.  Remember, no tampering with the jury now that we’ve got it seated.  Editor Sean Sirrine at Objective Justice thinks that you should be upset when you read the links in his post. 

Plaintiff's Opening Statement

This trial starts off with news of an accident that will likely spawn numerous personal injury trials, and some sought by a blogger.  Enrico Shaefer at Traverse Legal takes a look at the Ethan Allen ferry disaster, and writes a post arguing that it’s no freak accident.  Attorney Shaefer posts a question about his unusual usage of blogs and invites your comment:  Is this ambulance chasing with blogs or a valuable public service?  You decide.” 

The comment box is open.  Not only does MIPTC give you the opportunity to submit written comments, but you can leave either an audio comment by calling 206-338-3088, or you can submit a video comment by attaching your video clip to an email and sending it to the address at the end of this post. We post all three types of comments.  Side note here:  because of comment spam, you can't submit written comments with a URL, but if you'll send me an email, I'll post it for you. 

If you don't like boat accidents, here's another plaintiff's case for you:  the second major Vioxx trial, now pending in New Jersey.  It was featured on last week's internet radio program on the Legal Talk Network, Coast to Coast, hosted by in part by Bob Ambrogi.  You can either play (link starts audio) the thirty-minute show or download it (link starts download after free registration).  The previous week's show on diversity among bloggers featured, among others, Lisa Stone and Monica Bay.  Tune in for next week's show (available late Tuesday) on the new bankruptcy code. 

With at least two cases to put in front of the jury, the trial gets underway, and on to other blawgosphere topics.

Testimony

As we recover from Hurricane Katrina, we've all seen the damage to the Superdome in New Orleans.  The Sports Biz blog wonders whether the New Orleans Saints will use the force majure provision of their contract to terminate the lease and move out, since they're having a difficult time playing there.  Damages questions abound about the NFL and an $81 million of lease payments.  Jim Calloway advises to get your practice ready for a disaster from his blog, Jim Calloway’s Law Practice Tips Guide.  Ernie the Attorney has some first-hand experience he can share, plus a great blog to read. 

Plaintiff Rests

Thankfully, Matt Homann never does, however.  Over at the [non]billable hour, Matt and Dennis Kennedy are planning and plotting for BlawgThink, a unique seminar you might want to attend if you’re looking for some stimulation.  Speaking of conferences, if you missed the one on Knowledge Management in Chicago, then Joy London's got such a wonderful roundup that you won't want to miss a thing.

Defendant's Motion for a Directed Verdict

Law Technology News Editor Monica Bay, who doubles as a New York Yankees cheerleader and the writer of the graphically-enhanced and her always spot-on blawg, The Common Scold, makes a motion to nominate several previous blawg reviews  as "beyond kewl" (to steal a phrase from elsewhere in her post).  Equally important is Mon's welcome of the Blawg Review to the stable of Law.com bloggers, of which MIPTC is one, too (just for the sake of full disclosure).  You know, that big, honkin' ad up there?  Sympathies have been extended by Mike Fox for the Yankees' loss now that the Angels have dispatched the boys of summer back to their dugout.

Judge's Ruling

Monica will get no argument from this juror.  The posts she highlights deserve a look from you, gentle reader.   Now, assuming our trial included a class certification issue, we’d want to know what Kimberly Kralowec over at the UCL Practitioner says.  In her well-crafted summary of a recent California law on the subject, she raises some interesting questions.  Now that we're finished with the Plaintiff's case, the Old English Judge will issue another order.  Return, if you please, your mouse to the drawing of the Judge and click with speakers on.  He'll call Court back into session.   

Defendant's Opening Statement

Mergers are here to stay, proclaims Bruce MacEwen, the leading voice on law firm economics.  If you have any question about how law firms should be run, Adam Smith, Esq. is required daily reading.  My CFO reads it every day, and frequently informs me how the law firm should really be run.  WLF’s success is in part due to Bruce’s guidance.  Thanks, with a hat tip and deep bow to Bruce, even though I'm not sure he approves of merchandising Don’t miss Rees Morrison, either.  His blog, Law Department Management, is a must-read, too.  And one more, Prism Legal, if you need some consulting advice.

While you’re out there running a law firm, the Greatest American Lawyer, superhero “changing the way law is practiced” advises against using your own name in the title of your firm, especially given lawyer’s egos.  Be careful, though, before you go out on a limb.  Read the comments to that post first.  Hmmm.  Maybe I should rethink “WLF | The Williams Law Firm, PC.”   All three types of comments here at MIPTC are open, too. 

You can take some solace, though.  As Justice William W. Bedsworth points out in A Criminal Waste Of Space (hosted by MIPTC), no matter how bad you think it gets in your practice, you never had to represent Mr. Favel as a defendant.

Testimony

Blawgmother and appellate lawyer extraordinaire Denise Howell groks the conflict between the Grokster decision and the DCMA safe-harbor provisions.  She claims it’s a bit dense and esoteric, but she skillfully explains a conflict that needs resolution.  So, if you’re a defendant or would-be defendant in a suit that asserts copyright infringement under third-party liability theories or just otherwise interested in infringement, mosey your mouse over to Bag and Baggage for the full details.

Defendant Rests

Well, maybe quits, if you’re a Big Law Associate.  If you’re tired of trials, big law or just looking for an alternative, including going solo, give a look not only at the first link in the beginning of the sentence, but also the comments.  There are some worthwhile nuggets buried there.  Otherwise you could follow Stan’s life as a new associate over at the Legal Underground.  Both could seek some guidance from the blackprof.com, who asks why are lawyers so unhappy?  They’ve got a whole book to answer the question, not just a post.  The Wired GC thinks it may be enough just to unplug for a bit.

Instructing the Jury

Evan Brown’s Internet Cases gives us the Judge’s jury instructions from New York, who advises writers that if you sell books on Amazon.com, and someone writes a bad review of your work, you probably don't have grounds to sue the person writing the bad review.   Remember, there’s a comment box below, so with this ruling you can speak without restraint or fear that you’re reviewing a lawyer who knows how to sue. ;-)

Jury Deliberations

Now you've heard the whole trial, and it's time to sit down with your fellow jurors and evaluate the testimony that was offered, in all its glory.  In that last link, the Unreasonable Man, a 2L at the University of Minnesota Law School, complains about the Dark Side of Law School as evidenced in telephone conversation on a cell phone that he overheard.  As deliberations continue, do you drive down the road stringing together search queries to enter into the dialog box of your favorite search engine?  Over at Corante’s Between Lawyers, Denise wonders.  Well, wonder no longer if you’re looking for a podcast search engine, according to Bob Ambrogi, who writes Legal Sites, and points to Yahoo!’s new podcast search engine.

While the Jury Deliberates

What goes on behind the scenes at trials?  Here’s an inside look at the Scrushy trial from Houston’s Clear Thinkers, a great blog worth a close look.  You can also listen to Evan’s perspective on “The Insider.”

Reading of the Verdict

The folks over at Law Business Insider point to a recent $521 million verdict in favor of a company known as Eolas.  Steve Murphy, who writes Lawyers and Business Executives in the News, highlights the USPTO victory of Attorney Martin Lueck at RKMC.  Here’s what Mr. Lueck had to say.  There are all kinds of patents out there, says Bill Heinze at I/P Updates. 

Well, it may not be a verdict, but Beau at Got Shells? thinks Sharepoint software has it in the bag over many other software programs that allow clients to access your firm’s website.  Frankly, WLF uses Worldox Web for its clients' access to files, but I know several others that agree with Got Shells?, who's obviously a Microsoft devotee. 

Polling the Jury

Thankfully, God doesn’t sit on this jury, so the decision is not up to her.  It’s up to you, gentle reader, and some 100 Senators.  Legal Blog Watch doyenne and Pulitzer Prize-eligible journalist Lisa Stone asks the inevitable question on Miers’ nomination:  Thumbs up or thumbs down?

JNOV (Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict)

Ron Coleman at Likelihood of Confusion reports about the Delaware Supreme Court's reversal of a trial court decision that ordered an ISP to give up an anonymous blogger’s identify to a defamation plaintiff who sued that anonymous blogger.  The standards are pretty tough.

Asking the question whether it’s better for your client to stay in jail, the ambivalent imbroglio raises another tough issue.  Maybe better than in the morgue, according to Insurance Scrawl.  Certainly this guy, who floated ashore in his own matching luggage, raises some questions of his own.  Several of them are posed by Joe McFaul who writes Sharks In The Water, one of MIPTC's companion blawgs.

Appeal

Before we take this trial up on appeal, Jeremy Blachman wants to send Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers some Con-law study guides.  His blog, Jeremy’s Weblog, regularly posts funny tidbits like this one, each with its own side-splitting humor.  Well, at least a good belly laugh.  Remember, though, if you make a decision on appeal, you might get scolded by SCOTUS, and maybe justice-in-waiting Miers once and if she gets there.  Ex Post, a law student blawg, presents thoughtful posts on the subject worth a mouse click or two.  Or three.  Over at UCLA, Professor Bainbridge looks at the nomination from a purely scholarly perspective and determines that White House General Counsel Miers will end up looking a lot like Justice Lewis Powell.  That’s the scholarly version.  You’ll want to visit ProfessorBainbridge.com for the full perspective, including his blog of a conference call with the chair of the RNC.

Settlement

It’s never too late to think about settlement, especially if you’re Mark Wahlstrom over at The Settlement Channel.  This blog posts highlights a problem with settlements, though.  What happens when one party claims the other breached the settlement agreement?  The In House Blog points to fist fights as a possible settlement mechanism. 

Well, that’s it for this trial.  The Court is in recess, with another click of your mouse on the Old English Judge, he'll finish up with "Ahem, Ahem" because you're not quite finished yet, even though the time flies by, as noted by one of MIPTC's contributors (and my son), Michel Ayer.  One more paragraph.

MIPTC wraps up Blawg Review #28 with a thanks to you, gentle reader, and all the blawggers who contributed posts for this review.  If you don't use one of these news aggregators, you can listen to MIPTC’s post on your iPod courtesy of either iTunes or MIPTC’s Podcast RSS feed, or by clicking on the Podcast Icon below.  You can also watch it on your video iPod by clicking on MIPTC’s Vidcast RSS feed or your everyday computer by clicking on the Vidcast icon below (18+ minute video, 234 megs).  If you're looking for the Real Media version, click hereNext week will be Blawg Review #29, hosted by the Editor 'n' Chef at Blawg Review itself.  Stay tuned.  Same Bat-time, but a different Bat-channel than MIPTC.  Blawg Review has information about next week's host, and instructions how to get your blawg posts reviewed in upcoming issues.

Podcast 

Vidcast

Printer friendly page Permalink Email to a friend Posted by J. Craig Williams on Monday, October 17, 2005 at 00:38 Comments Closed (2) |
 
Share Link  

 


  Text-Only Site